As Singapore grapples with technological disruptions, global competition, and demographic shifts, mid-career Professionals, Managers, Executives, and Technicians (PMETs) face mounting challenges.
Concerns over job security, wage stagnation, and the need for reskilling have become central to national discourse. Ahead of the 2025 General Election (GE2025), political parties are outlining their strategies to address these issues.
This article examines the approaches of the People's Action Party (PAP), the Workers' Party (WP), and the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) to tackle PMET employment challenges.
By comparing their policies and priorities, we aim to provide a clearer understanding of how each party plans to support this critical segment of the workforce.
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM), representing the incumbent PAP government, has introduced a multi-pronged strategy to empower PMETs:
The Workers’ Party (WP) has launched its campaign for GE2025 with a focus on representation and constructive opposition:
The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) appears to focus on stricter regulations for foreign talent, though specifics remain limited:
Aspect | PAP | WP | PSP |
---|---|---|---|
Focus Areas | Skills development, foreign competition, aging workforce, tripartism | Representation, constructive opposition | Stricter foreign talent controls |
Specific PMET Policies | SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support, EP threshold increase, flexible work arrangements | Broad goals; no specific PMET policies disclosed | Potential EP salary hike to S$10,000 |
Strengths | Comprehensive, proactive, and aligned with current government initiatives | Emphasizes representation and accountability | Addresses concerns about foreign competition |
Challenges | Balancing foreign talent inflow with local hiring needs | Lack of detailed PMET-specific policies | Risk of hindering sectors with talent shortages |
The challenges faced by mid-career PMETs are multifaceted, requiring nuanced and targeted solutions.
The PAP government has introduced a robust framework of skills development, foreign competition management, and workplace adaptability.
Meanwhile, the WP focuses on representation and accountability, though specific PMET policies remain unclear.
The PSP, on the other hand, advocates for tighter foreign talent controls, which could protect local jobs but risks exacerbating talent shortages in key sectors.
As Singapore moves toward GE2025, voters must weigh these approaches carefully. Whether prioritising comprehensive programmes, constructive opposition, or stricter regulations, the ultimate goal remains the same: ensuring PMETs can thrive in an evolving economic landscape.
Let us know what you think about this topic, and what do you want to hear next.
Read more on these party policies breakdown on:
You can now be our community contributor and make a pitch to have your favourite personality be on our show.
Join our community group and drop us your insights on this topic.