In the pre-dawn darkness of Bedok Block 216 Food Centre, 60-year-old Cai Mei Qin and her son begin their daily ritual at 3:30 AM. By 4:30 AM, the first customers are already queuing for her mee hoon kueh—hand-torn noodle soup that costs just $2.50 with meat and vegetables, no egg. In a nation where the Institute of Policy Studies calculates that eating out three meals a day costs an average of $17, Cai's stall represents something increasingly rare: genuinely affordable sustenance.
"There are more elderly people here, so I put up a $2.50 option," Cai explains, her weathered hands working the dough. "Because you see young people nowadays have to support themselves, to support their wife and two children. They have to maintain both the car and the house. Where can they get the money to feed the elderly?"
This economic reality—hawkers subsidising Singapore's cost of living crisis through razor-thin margins—reveals uncomfortable truths about who truly bears the burden of affordability in one of the world's most expensive cities.
The numbers behind Singapore's hawker food inflation tell a stark story. According to the Singapore Department of Statistics, hawker food prices rose by 6.1% in 2023—the highest increase since 2008. The Straits Times reports that chicken rice jumped from $3.40 in 2019 to $4.15 in 2023, whilst mee rebus increased from $3.26 to $3.79 in the same period.
Yet hawkers like Cai operate in a different economic universe. Her stall rental is approximately $2,000 monthly, as she notes: "Only two people at most, the money we earn is barely enough to cover the wages of both of us." With Progressive Wage Model requirements setting minimum wages for food service workers at $2,080 monthly for stall assistants (as of March 2025), the arithmetic becomes clearer: each $2.50 bowl must contribute towards rent, wages, ingredients, utilities, and—theoretically—profit.
At Sun Kee Drinks in Kovan Hougang Market, the economic defiance is even more pronounced. Their soymilk has remained $0.30 since 1985—four decades of price stability in a nation where overall inflation has transformed every other aspect of daily life. "My rent is very cheap (per month). $200 is very cheap. So we think we can sell it so cheaply to help some poor people," explains the proprietor.
What enables this pricing model reveals the hidden architecture of Singapore's food affordability. Government rental subsidies form the foundation: whilst median rent for non-subsidised hawker stalls ranges from $2,900 to $3,300 monthly according to recent Reddit discussions, subsidised stallholders pay as little as $192 to $384 monthly, depending on their hawker centre's upgrading status. The Straits Times confirms that subsidised rent is "heavily subsidised at about $300 a month."
This represents a massive government intervention in food pricing—one that disproportionately benefits Singapore's wealthy professionals. Consider the arithmetic: a finance director earning $15,000 monthly saves approximately $4.50 per meal by eating subsidised hawker food instead of restaurant fare. Over a year, this amounts to nearly $5,000 in savings—a sum that barely registers as a percentage of their income. Meanwhile, the hawkers providing this service earn less than $3,000 monthly.
Perhaps most tellingly, these affordable food prices represent an intergenerational wealth transfer from elderly hawkers to younger, wealthier Singaporeans. Cai Mei Qin, at 60, works 17-hour days to maintain her $2.50 pricing. "Until I can't do it anymore, I'll just retire," she says, acknowledging the physical toll.
The Progressive Wage Model, whilst improving conditions for food service employees, adds additional cost pressures. Monthly wages for food stall assistants have risen from $1,750 in March 2023 to $2,080 by March 2025—a 19% increase over two years. These mandated wage increases, whilst socially beneficial, squeeze margins further for operations like Cai's.
At Nguan Express 88 Chicken Rice, the owner explicitly acknowledges the business model's limitations: "I don't think I'll open a shop selling $2 food. I will die." Yet after relocating to reduce rent by 30%, they dropped chicken rice prices from $3.80 to $1.90, selling 500-600 plates daily through pure volume economics.
For Singapore's high-earning professionals—those earning $8,000 to $20,000 monthly—subsidised hawker food represents an enormous lifestyle dividend. The Institute of Policy Studies' Makan Index 2.0 found breakfast costs average $4.81, lunch $6.01, and dinner $6.20 at hawker centres and coffee shops. For a professional household, this translates to monthly food costs of approximately $1,000 for two people—barely 3-5% of combined household income.
Compare this to London or New York, where similar convenience and quality would cost 300-400% more relative to local wages. A $2.50 mee hoon kueh in Singapore delivers nutrition and flavour equivalent to a £8-10 meal in London—but represents a far smaller percentage of median professional income in Singapore.
This pricing enables Singapore's professional class to enjoy one of the world's most diverse and convenient food ecosystems whilst directing their higher incomes towards property, education, and investments. The real subsidy isn't just governmental—it's provided by hawkers like Cai Mei Qin who prioritise community service over profit maximisation.
The model's long-term sustainability remains questionable. As Cai notes about her son's reluctance to inherit the business: "He also kept telling me that he doesn't want to do it because he said it was too hard." The next generation of hawkers faces rising costs without the pioneer generation's subsidised rents and community-first mentality.
Bloomberg reports that Singapore's inflation hit a four-year low in 2025, providing some relief. However, structural cost pressures remain: utilities, imported ingredients, and mandated wage increases continue rising faster than hawker food prices can accommodate.
The government's recent $1 billion hawker centre upgrade programme and $600 rental support announced in Budget 2025 acknowledges these pressures, but represents temporary relief rather than structural solutions.
For Singapore's wealthy professionals, the question becomes ethical as much as economic. Should a managing director earning $25,000 monthly queue for $2.50 mee hoon kueh alongside elderly residents on fixed incomes? The market provides no pricing signals to discourage this—and hawkers like Cai explicitly welcome all customers.
Yet the sustainability crisis suggests this arrangement increasingly depends on the goodwill and physical endurance of ageing hawkers. As Dr. Teo Kay Key from the Institute of Policy Studies notes, "given that these hawkers are decreasing in number, Singapore could see larger price increases for hawker centre food in the future."
The true cost of Singapore's affordable hawker food isn't captured in the $2.50 price tag—it's measured in 3:30 AM wake-up calls, elderly bodies bent over steaming woks, and the gradual disappearance of a generation willing to prioritise community service over personal profit.
For the professionals who benefit most from this system, perhaps the question isn't whether they can afford to pay more—but whether they can afford not to, before the last of Singapore's affordable hawkers decides they simply cannot continue.
Let us know what you think about this topic, and what do you want to hear next.
Sources:
You can now be our community contributor and make a pitch to have your favourite personality be on our show.
Join our community group and drop us your insights on this topic.